kokesh@lemmy.world
on 04 Jan 2024 08:52
nextcollapse
Something Earth needs…
muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
on 04 Jan 2024 09:37
collapse
Death is the final disease.
Norgur@kbin.social
on 04 Jan 2024 09:50
nextcollapse
This sounds like one of those sciency bullshit articles where
a) the study was on a subcategory of proteins that in some very boring and specific cases influence the aging of a certain type of cell in a minor way
b) the study was a miniscule pilot study with 10 participants
c) it explicitly said that it's results are more than shaky and need further testing to prove anything
d) it didn't mention humans aging at all
e) the participants were some kind of worm
but some journalist read half the excerpt, misunderstood it completely and did a catchy article about what he hallucinated into the study.
Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
on 04 Jan 2024 10:45
nextcollapse
The state of science reporting has been absolute dog shit for decades. The vast majority of the time when you track down the study an article is based on, the claims of the article are either massively exaggerated, or sometimes even completely different than what the article claims. It seems like a whole industry of taking fairly mundane studies and punching them up into some exciting pieces of short fiction. So many years of garbage reporting has me immediately skeptical of any article with a bold claim, or which mentions any kind of significant breakthrough.
Coffee cures cancer... no, it causes cancer... it cures cancer, but only when drank with half a tablespoon of wine... but wine causes cancer... no cures it... no it does both but only with chocolate... chocolate cures cancer... no it causes cancer... no it... and so on and so forth....
This half-assed, sensationalistic reporting of studies that are completely insignificant outside of a specific case in their respective fields causes so much harm when it comes to the trust of people in science.
Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website
on 04 Jan 2024 11:46
nextcollapse
And thousands of people everywhere read that title, didn’t bother looking a single bit into it, and are now repeating to everyone they know “Japan cured aging!” until someone corrects them.
skeezix@lemmy.world
on 04 Jan 2024 12:41
nextcollapse
Hey, clicks make money!! /s
bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
on 04 Jan 2024 12:56
nextcollapse
Hey now! It might not even be a journalist doing the hallucinating nowadays. We can get the robots to hallucinate for us!
HubertManne@kbin.social
on 04 Jan 2024 16:19
collapse
also there are aging studies that indicate getting damage cells to self destruct helps being healthier as you age so you want to increase senescence rather than reduce it.
DessertStorms@kbin.social
on 04 Jan 2024 13:15
nextcollapse
Now imagine if the rich people funding this bullshit hoping to live forever on their yachts put their money back in to society instead, so that the rest of us might also consider living longer a bonus rather than a punishment...
threaded - newest
Something Earth needs…
Death is the final disease.
This sounds like one of those sciency bullshit articles where
a) the study was on a subcategory of proteins that in some very boring and specific cases influence the aging of a certain type of cell in a minor way
b) the study was a miniscule pilot study with 10 participants
c) it explicitly said that it's results are more than shaky and need further testing to prove anything
d) it didn't mention humans aging at all
e) the participants were some kind of worm
but some journalist read half the excerpt, misunderstood it completely and did a catchy article about what he hallucinated into the study.
The state of science reporting has been absolute dog shit for decades. The vast majority of the time when you track down the study an article is based on, the claims of the article are either massively exaggerated, or sometimes even completely different than what the article claims. It seems like a whole industry of taking fairly mundane studies and punching them up into some exciting pieces of short fiction. So many years of garbage reporting has me immediately skeptical of any article with a bold claim, or which mentions any kind of significant breakthrough.
Coffee cures cancer... no, it causes cancer... it cures cancer, but only when drank with half a tablespoon of wine... but wine causes cancer... no cures it... no it does both but only with chocolate... chocolate cures cancer... no it causes cancer... no it... and so on and so forth....
This half-assed, sensationalistic reporting of studies that are completely insignificant outside of a specific case in their respective fields causes so much harm when it comes to the trust of people in science.
And thousands of people everywhere read that title, didn’t bother looking a single bit into it, and are now repeating to everyone they know “Japan cured aging!” until someone corrects them.
Hey, clicks make money!! /s
Hey now! It might not even be a journalist doing the hallucinating nowadays. We can get the robots to hallucinate for us!
also there are aging studies that indicate getting damage cells to self destruct helps being healthier as you age so you want to increase senescence rather than reduce it.
Now imagine if the rich people funding this bullshit hoping to live forever on their yachts put their money back in to society instead, so that the rest of us might also consider living longer a bonus rather than a punishment...
Why though? We have way too many rich assholes already …
Altered Carbon ¯\_(ツ)_/¯